Ute vs Yaqui In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Ute
Yaqui
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Ute
Yaqui
73.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
76.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Yaqui In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,599 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.526 and weighted average of 73.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,721,250 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yaqui and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 76.5%, a difference of 3.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Yaqui |
Minimum | 25.5% | 50.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 85.4% |
Range | 74.5% | 35.0% |
Mean | 66.1% | 72.1% |
Median | 69.2% | 73.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 55.7% | 70.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.7% | 76.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.0% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Yaqui by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (73.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Native/Alaskan (73.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Arapaho (74.4%, a difference of 0.98%), Paiute (74.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Colville (74.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yaqui are Ottawa (76.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.40%), Chickasaw (76.2%, a difference of 0.44%), Inupiat (76.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 76.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 76.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 76.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 76.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 76.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 75.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 75.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 75.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 75.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 75.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 75.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 75.1% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 75.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 75.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 74.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 74.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 74.7% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 74.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 73.9% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 73.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 73.7% |