Ute vs Tohono O'odham In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Ute
Tohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Ute
Tohono O'odham
60.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
57.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Tohono O'odham In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,668,599 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.640 and weighted average of 60.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,725,311 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.613 and weighted average of 57.2%, a difference of 6.4%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 19.4% | 12.8% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 82.3% |
| Range | 47.3% | 69.5% |
| Mean | 51.3% | 50.1% |
| Median | 53.2% | 56.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.4% | 40.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 61.1% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.6% | 22.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Tohono O'odham by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Crow (60.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Paiute (60.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Apache (60.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Native/Alaskan (60.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Menominee (60.6%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Pima (57.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Lumbee (56.8%, a difference of 0.85%), Yuman (57.8%, a difference of 0.99%), Navajo (56.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and Puerto Rican (58.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 60.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 60.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 60.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 60.6% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 59.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 59.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 59.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 59.3% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 58.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 58.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 57.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 57.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 57.2% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 56.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 56.6% |