Turkish vs South American Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Turkish
South American Indian
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Turks
South American Indians
35.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
35.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
14.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs South American Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,508,687 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 35.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,452,175 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 35.8%, a difference of 1.0%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | South American Indian |
Minimum | 7.4% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 78.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 70.7% | 90.0% |
Mean | 35.1% | 42.8% |
Median | 36.0% | 35.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 28.6% | 29.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.8% | 56.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 27.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and South American Indians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Ghana (35.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ghanaian (35.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Bahamas (35.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Guatemalan (35.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Sri Lankan (35.5%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Chilean (35.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (35.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Albania (35.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Korean (35.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (35.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 16.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 35.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 15.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 35.8% |
South American Indians | 14.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 35.8% |
Chileans | 14.6 /100 | #206 | Poor 35.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 14.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 35.8% |
Koreans | 13.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 35.7% |
Moroccans | 12.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 35.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 11.9 /100 | #210 | Poor 35.6% |
Mexicans | 11.9 /100 | #211 | Poor 35.6% |
Houma | 11.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 35.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 11.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 35.6% |
Apache | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 35.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 10.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 35.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 10.7 /100 | #216 | Poor 35.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 10.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 35.6% |
Sri Lankans | 9.8 /100 | #218 | Tragic 35.5% |
Guatemalans | 8.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 35.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 35.5% |
Turks | 7.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 35.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 7.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 35.4% |
Ghanaians | 6.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 35.3% |