Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,758,422 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 30.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,166,794 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.762 and weighted average of 31.1%, a difference of 0.70%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Trinidadian and Tobagonian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	9.5%	8.3%
Maximum	67.1%	41.3%
Range	57.6%	33.0%
Mean	32.1%	25.6%
Median	32.5%	27.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	24.6%	21.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	37.4%	30.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.8%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.7%	7.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.6%	7.3%

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Immigrants from China by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Barbadian (31.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Ecuador (31.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Taiwan (31.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Dominican (31.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Caribbean (31.2%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Taiwan (31.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (31.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 31.5%
Soviet Union	0.0 /100 \| #319	Tragic 31.4%
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 30.0%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.6%