Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Eritrea In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,892,263 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 38.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,843,634 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.287 and weighted average of 38.7%, a difference of 0.63%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Subsaharan African	Immigrants from Eritrea
Minimum	19.0%	15.4%
Maximum	69.1%	68.4%
Range	50.1%	53.0%
Mean	40.9%	42.4%
Median	39.6%	39.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.9%	35.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	44.0%	49.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.0%	13.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.7%	11.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.6%	11.2%

Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from Eritrea by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Hawaiian (38.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (38.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Crow (38.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Maltese (38.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eritrea are Immigrants from Cameroon (38.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Hmong (38.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (38.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Thailand (38.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Ugandans	99.3 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	99.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 38.9%
Immigrants \| Thailand	99.1 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 38.7%
Hmong	99.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 38.7%
Zimbabweans	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	99.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 38.7%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	99.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 38.7%
Iraqis	98.9 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 38.6%
Delaware	98.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 38.6%
Chinese	98.8 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 38.6%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	98.7 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 38.6%
Lebanese	98.7 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 38.6%
Maltese	98.6 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 38.5%
Crow	98.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 38.5%
Immigrants \| Scotland	98.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 38.5%
Sub-Saharan Africans	98.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 38.4%
Hawaiians	98.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 38.4%
Bulgarians	97.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 38.3%
Colville	97.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 38.3%
Chickasaw	97.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 38.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.8 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 38.3%