Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Jordan In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Jordan
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Jordan
31.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
69.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Jordan In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,506,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552 and weighted average of 31.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,222,099 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 36.9%, a difference of 17.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 6.3% | 7.6% |
Maximum | 86.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 80.4% | 92.4% |
Mean | 34.8% | 38.0% |
Median | 32.7% | 37.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.2% | 34.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.1% | 41.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 14.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 13.9% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Ecuadorian (31.4%, a difference of 0.060%), West Indian (31.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Yemen (31.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Tohono O'odham (31.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (31.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 31.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 31.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 31.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 31.7% |
Filipinos | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 31.7% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 31.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 31.5% |
Soviet Union | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 31.4% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 31.4% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 31.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 31.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 31.2% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 31.2% |
Immigrants | China | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 31.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 31.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (36.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kuwait (36.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (37.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Yakama (36.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (36.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 80.7 /100 | #155 | Excellent 37.2% |
Kiowa | 80.4 /100 | #156 | Excellent 37.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 76.5 /100 | #157 | Good 37.1% |
Ute | 75.7 /100 | #158 | Good 37.1% |
Yaqui | 74.4 /100 | #159 | Good 37.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 73.9 /100 | #160 | Good 37.0% |
Cambodians | 71.5 /100 | #161 | Good 37.0% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 69.5 /100 | #162 | Good 36.9% |
Bermudans | 69.3 /100 | #163 | Good 36.9% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 68.9 /100 | #164 | Good 36.9% |
Yakama | 66.9 /100 | #165 | Good 36.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 66.7 /100 | #166 | Good 36.9% |
Arabs | 63.6 /100 | #167 | Good 36.8% |
Palestinians | 63.1 /100 | #168 | Good 36.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 61.6 /100 | #169 | Good 36.8% |