South American vs Aleut In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
South American
Aleut
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
South Americans
Aleuts
66.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Aleut In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,183,662 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South Americans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 66.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,782,890 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 66.0%, a difference of 0.080%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Aleut |
Minimum | 40.6% | 26.4% |
Maximum | 86.5% | 93.1% |
Range | 45.9% | 66.7% |
Mean | 66.8% | 62.5% |
Median | 66.7% | 65.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.5% | 51.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 73.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 14.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 14.8% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Aleuts by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are South American Indian (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Mongolian (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Central American (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and German Russian (66.1%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from South America (66.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Iranian (66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cambodia (66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uruguay (66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Laos (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Malaysians | 99.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Moroccans | 99.5 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 66.1% |
German Russians | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Central Americans | 99.4 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Mongolians | 99.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 66.1% |
South Americans | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South American Indians | 99.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Bermudans | 99.3 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Iranians | 99.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Aleuts | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Bangladeshis | 98.9 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.9% |