Slavic vs Scandinavian In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Slavic
Scandinavian
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Comparison
Slavs
Scandinavians
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
71.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
83.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
78.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Scandinavian In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,794,897 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 82.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,233,572 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 83.0%, a difference of 0.080%.
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Scandinavian |
Minimum | 62.2% | 52.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 37.8% | 48.0% |
Mean | 85.4% | 88.5% |
Median | 83.9% | 86.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 77.8% | 83.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.0% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 16.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Scandinavians by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Netherlands (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ghana (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Sweden (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Yugoslavian (83.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Ghanaian (83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Haiti (83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (83.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Okinawan (83.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
Austrians | 81.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 83.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 81.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 83.0% |
Immigrants | Spain | 80.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 83.0% |
Ghanaians | 79.5 /100 | #138 | Good 83.0% |
Scandinavians | 78.5 /100 | #139 | Good 83.0% |
Yugoslavians | 78.3 /100 | #140 | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 77.9 /100 | #141 | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 77.8 /100 | #142 | Good 83.0% |
Okinawans | 77.0 /100 | #143 | Good 83.0% |
Soviet Union | 76.8 /100 | #144 | Good 83.0% |
Romanians | 75.4 /100 | #145 | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants | France | 75.3 /100 | #146 | Good 83.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 74.1 /100 | #148 | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 73.3 /100 | #149 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 72.6 /100 | #150 | Good 82.9% |
Koreans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 82.9% |
Slavs | 71.5 /100 | #152 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 70.6 /100 | #153 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 70.3 /100 | #154 | Good 82.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 69.0 /100 | #155 | Good 82.9% |