Polish vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Polish
Latvian
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Poles
Latvians
85.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Latvian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,917,844 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Poles and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100 and weighted average of 85.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,671,100 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 85.4%, a difference of 0.19%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Latvian |
Minimum | 37.5% | 55.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.5% | 44.6% |
Mean | 86.4% | 87.3% |
Median | 86.6% | 86.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 85.2% | 84.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.9% | 95.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Latvians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Bulgaria (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (85.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and Eastern European (85.2%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Paraguayan (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Liberia (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (85.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (85.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 85.4% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Bermudans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Ugandans | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Kenyans | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Poles | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.2% |