Osage vs Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Osage
Guatemalan
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Comparison
Osage
Guatemalans
80.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Guatemalan In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,641 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.169 and weighted average of 80.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,275,679 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 81.2%, a difference of 0.72%.
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Guatemalan |
Minimum | 35.3% | 45.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 64.7% | 54.5% |
Mean | 77.9% | 79.0% |
Median | 80.6% | 80.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 74.0% | 77.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 89.1% | 83.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Guatemalans by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Iroquois (80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belize (80.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Nepalese (80.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Mexican American Indian (80.7%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are U.S. Virgin Islander (81.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Nonimmigrants (81.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Guatemala (81.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Micronesia (81.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Latin America (81.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 81.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 81.2% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 81.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 81.0% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 81.0% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 81.0% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 80.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 80.8% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 80.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 80.8% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 80.8% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 80.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 80.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 80.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 80.6% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 80.6% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 80.6% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 80.5% |