Okinawan vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Okinawan
Lithuanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Okinawans
Lithuanians
65.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
17.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Okinawan vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,766,468 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,961,459 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Okinawan | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 36.8% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 78.6% | 76.6% |
Range | 41.8% | 43.3% |
Mean | 64.6% | 59.0% |
Median | 65.7% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.5% | 54.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.5% | 64.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 9.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Okinawans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Australia (65.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Colombia (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (65.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | South America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Bangladeshis | 98.9 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Okinawans | 98.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Uruguayans | 98.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Colombians | 98.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Latin America (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Russian (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Slovene (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Jamaican (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Mexican American Indians | 23.1 /100 | #199 | Fair 64.9% |
Armenians | 20.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 64.9% |
Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |