Moroccan vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Moroccan
Chippewa
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Moroccans
Chippewa
84.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
23.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,769,672 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.407 and weighted average of 84.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,016,348 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043 and weighted average of 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Chippewa |
Minimum | 38.6% | 26.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 61.4% | 73.9% |
Mean | 82.2% | 79.1% |
Median | 84.5% | 82.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 77.7% | 70.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.1% | 87.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 15.7% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Syrian (84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), British (84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Europe (84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Ecuadorian (84.2%, a difference of 0.010%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Hungarians | 26.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 84.2% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 25.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 84.2% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 25.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 84.2% |
Immigrants | England | 25.0 /100 | #196 | Fair 84.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 24.7 /100 | #197 | Fair 84.2% |
Ecuadorians | 24.0 /100 | #198 | Fair 84.2% |
Syrians | 23.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 84.2% |
Moroccans | 23.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 84.2% |
British | 23.0 /100 | #201 | Fair 84.2% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 22.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 84.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 22.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 84.2% |
Canadians | 19.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 19.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.2% |
Laotians | 19.0 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Puget Sound Salish (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), African (82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Belize (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 82.9% |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 82.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 82.9% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 82.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 82.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 82.9% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 82.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 82.8% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 82.7% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 82.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 82.6% |