Mexican vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Mexican
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Mexicans
Chickasaw
77.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
76.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mexican vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,322,836 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.819 and weighted average of 77.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 76.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mexican | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 66.4% | 38.5% |
Maximum | 80.9% | 87.5% |
Range | 14.5% | 49.0% |
Mean | 76.0% | 69.2% |
Median | 76.5% | 70.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 74.0% | 65.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.6% | 75.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Mexicans and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Mexicans are Potawatomi (77.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Mexico (77.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Chippewa (77.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Central American Indian (77.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Alaska Native (77.0%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (76.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (76.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ottawa (76.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 77.5% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 77.5% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 77.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 77.3% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 77.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 77.2% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 77.1% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 77.0% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 77.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 77.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 77.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 76.9% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 76.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 76.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 76.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 76.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 76.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 76.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 76.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 75.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 75.5% |