Marshallese vs Czech In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Marshallese
Czech
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Marshallese
Czechs
79.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Czech In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 79.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,299,393 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409 and weighted average of 85.5%, a difference of 7.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Czech |
| Minimum | 24.0% | 72.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 76.0% | 27.2% |
| Mean | 73.9% | 89.8% |
| Median | 77.3% | 88.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.5% | 85.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.9% | 95.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.3% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Russian (85.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and Filipino (85.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.6 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Czechs | 99.6 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Soviet Union | 99.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 85.5% |