Maltese vs Immigrants from Northern Europe In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,440,103 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Maltese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.575 and weighted average of 84.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,925,244 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Maltese	Immigrants from Northern Europe
Minimum	25.7%	56.4%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	74.3%	43.6%
Mean	83.6%	85.3%
Median	85.1%	85.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	82.1%	81.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	89.4%	94.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.3%	13.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.5%	11.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.4%	11.6%

Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Northern Europe by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Immigrants from South America (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Slavic (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Asian (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Spain (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), and Finnish (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Burmese (84.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Finnish (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), German (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from South America (84.7%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Western Africa	93.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 84.7%
Uruguayans	93.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 84.7%
Chileans	93.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 84.7%
Bahamians	93.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Egypt	92.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| China	92.3 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	92.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 84.7%
Burmese	91.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	91.5 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 84.7%
Finns	91.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 84.7%
Germans	91.0 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| South America	90.9 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 84.7%
Slavs	90.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 84.7%
Maltese	90.8 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 84.7%
Asians	90.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Spain	90.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 84.7%
Immigrants \| Ghana	90.4 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 84.7%
Palestinians	89.7 /100 \| #129	Excellent 84.7%
Bhutanese	89.7 /100 \| #130	Excellent 84.7%
Immigrants \| Scotland	89.6 /100 \| #131	Excellent 84.7%
Austrians	89.4 /100 \| #132	Excellent 84.7%