Malaysian vs Immigrants from Micronesia In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,967,692 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154 and weighted average of 39.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,545,841 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.309 and weighted average of 40.2%, a difference of 1.1%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Malaysian	Immigrants from Micronesia
Minimum	12.6%	1.9%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	87.4%	98.1%
Mean	45.8%	46.9%
Median	41.3%	42.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	36.7%	35.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	48.6%	55.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.9%	20.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	18.9%	22.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	18.8%	22.1%

Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Micronesia by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Immigrants from Portugal (39.7%, a difference of 0.13%), French American Indian (39.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Hungarian (39.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (39.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Austrian (39.5%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Kenyan (40.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Northern European (40.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Cherokee (40.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Nonimmigrants (40.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Canadian (40.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 40.4%
Americans	100.0 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 40.3%
Cherokee	100.0 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 40.2%
Northern Europeans	100.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 40.2%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	100.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 40.2%
Kenyans	100.0 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 40.1%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	100.0 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 40.1%
Canadians	100.0 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 40.1%
Italians	99.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 40.1%
Potawatomi	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 40.0%
Portuguese	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 40.0%
Serbians	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 39.9%
Iroquois	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 39.9%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 39.9%
Hungarians	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 39.8%
French American Indians	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 39.8%
Malaysians	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 39.7%
Immigrants \| Portugal	99.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 39.7%
Austrians	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 39.5%
Marshallese	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 39.5%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 39.4%