Luxembourger vs Thai In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Thai
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Thais
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Thai In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,682,920 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.596 and weighted average of 81.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,903,874 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Thais and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332 and weighted average of 80.9%, a difference of 1.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Thai |
Minimum | 76.2% | 74.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 91.6% |
Range | 23.8% | 16.9% |
Mean | 85.5% | 82.2% |
Median | 84.9% | 82.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.7% | 80.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.0% | 83.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Thais by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Bolivia (81.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Ethiopian (82.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Bolivian (81.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Somali (81.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (81.6%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Liberian (80.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Zimbabwean (81.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (81.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Norwegian (81.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Sudanese (80.8%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 82.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 81.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 81.9% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 81.7% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 81.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 81.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 81.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 81.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 81.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 81.3% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 81.3% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 81.3% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 80.9% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 80.9% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 80.8% |