Lumbee vs Choctaw In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Lumbee
Choctaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Lumbee
Choctaw
56.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Choctaw In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,293,168 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 56.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,719,523 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 61.5%, a difference of 8.3%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Choctaw |
Minimum | 38.2% | 31.5% |
Maximum | 65.7% | 81.6% |
Range | 27.5% | 50.1% |
Mean | 51.4% | 53.1% |
Median | 51.7% | 52.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.6% | 49.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.4% | 56.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Choctaw by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Navajo (56.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Tohono O'odham (57.2%, a difference of 0.85%), Pima (57.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (57.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and Puerto Rican (58.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (61.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Dutch West Indian (61.7%, a difference of 0.36%), Cajun (61.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Ute (60.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and Crow (60.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 60.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 60.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 60.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 60.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 60.6% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 60.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 59.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 59.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 59.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 59.3% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 58.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 58.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 57.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 57.4% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 57.2% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 56.8% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 56.6% |