Iroquois vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Iroquois
Houma
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Iroquois
Houma
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,240,076 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512 and weighted average of 81.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,791,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 79.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Houma |
Minimum | 18.3% | 40.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 93.9% |
Range | 81.7% | 53.2% |
Mean | 78.4% | 76.8% |
Median | 82.8% | 79.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.7% | 71.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.2% | 86.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.5% | 15.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Houma by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (81.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Cherokee (81.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and Arapaho (81.5%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Kiowa (79.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.58%), Creek (80.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and Colville (80.7%, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |