Iroquois vs Aleut In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Iroquois
Aleut
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Comparison
Iroquois
Aleuts
80.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Aleut In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,246,780 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 80.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,774,977 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329 and weighted average of 81.0%, a difference of 0.43%.
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Aleut |
Minimum | 40.0% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.0% | 87.5% |
Mean | 79.3% | 78.8% |
Median | 79.9% | 81.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 74.2% | 70.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.7% | 96.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 25.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 20.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 20.5% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Aleuts by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Osage (80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belize (80.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Nepalese (80.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and African (80.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Latin America (81.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Grenada (81.0%, a difference of 0.070%), French American Indian (80.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Micronesia (81.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (81.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 81.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 81.1% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 81.0% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 81.0% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 81.0% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 80.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 80.8% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 80.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 80.8% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 80.8% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 80.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 80.7% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 80.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 80.6% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 80.6% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 80.6% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 80.5% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 80.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 80.4% |