Inupiat vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Inupiat
Zimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Inupiat
Zimbabweans
79.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Zimbabwean In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,336,541 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 79.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,193,973 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 85.6%, a difference of 7.4%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 35.7% | 50.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.3% | 50.0% |
| Mean | 74.7% | 86.8% |
| Median | 78.0% | 86.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.5% | 84.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.7% | 91.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.3% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Kiowa (79.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Houma (79.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Lithuania (85.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (85.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (85.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (85.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Nepal (85.6%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Serbians | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 85.8% |
| Albanians | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.6% |