Indian (Asian) vs Norwegian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Indian (Asian)
Norwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Indians (Asian)
Norwegians
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indian (Asian) vs Norwegian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 495,373,057 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 533,394,126 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 65.7%, a difference of 0.24%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Indian (Asian) | Norwegian |
Minimum | 46.3% | 27.6% |
Maximum | 82.9% | 92.5% |
Range | 36.6% | 64.9% |
Mean | 64.1% | 65.2% |
Median | 64.5% | 65.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.3% | 62.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.6% | 68.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) and Norwegians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Korean (65.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (65.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Immigrants | Iraq | 95.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Iraqis | 95.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Norwegians | 95.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Koreans | 95.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Ecuadorians | 94.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 94.4 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Icelanders | 94.3 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 94.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |