Immigrants from Philippines vs Japanese In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,291,976 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,190,051 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 65.8%, a difference of 0.26%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Philippines	Japanese
Minimum	39.6%	26.8%
Maximum	88.4%	86.5%
Range	48.8%	59.7%
Mean	66.5%	62.1%
Median	65.8%	65.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	63.8%	59.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	68.3%	67.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.5%	7.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.5%	10.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.5%	10.3%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines and Japanese by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Korean (65.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Iraq (65.7%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Honduras (65.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (65.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Honduran (65.8%, a difference of 0.070%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Japan	98.0 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 65.8%
Japanese	97.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 65.8%
Immigrants \| Honduras	97.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 65.8%
Laotians	97.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 65.8%
Pakistanis	97.1 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 65.8%
Hondurans	97.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 65.8%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	96.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 65.7%
Argentineans	96.7 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Iran	96.6 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	96.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| France	96.4 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.2 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 65.7%
New Zealanders	96.0 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	95.9 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Iraq	95.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 65.7%
Iraqis	95.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 65.7%
Norwegians	95.3 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 65.7%
Koreans	95.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%