Immigrants from Middle Africa vs French American Indian In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,678,432 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 39.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,885,422 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.153 and weighted average of 39.8%, a difference of 0.25%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Middle Africa	French American Indian
Minimum	17.7%	8.2%
Maximum	63.3%	68.0%
Range	45.6%	59.8%
Mean	40.6%	41.5%
Median	40.1%	42.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	35.3%	33.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	45.4%	48.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.1%	15.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.1%	14.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.0%	14.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and French American Indians by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Iroquois (39.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Serbian (39.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (40.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Hungarian (39.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Potawatomi (40.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Hungarian (39.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Malaysian (39.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Serbian (39.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Iroquois (39.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Portugal (39.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Micronesia	100.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 40.2%
Kenyans	100.0 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 40.1%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	100.0 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 40.1%
Canadians	100.0 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 40.1%
Italians	99.9 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 40.1%
Potawatomi	99.9 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 40.0%
Portuguese	99.9 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 40.0%
Serbians	99.9 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 39.9%
Iroquois	99.9 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 39.9%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	99.9 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 39.9%
Hungarians	99.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 39.8%
French American Indians	99.9 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 39.8%
Malaysians	99.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 39.7%
Immigrants \| Portugal	99.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 39.7%
Austrians	99.8 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 39.5%
Marshallese	99.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 39.5%
Immigrants \| Iraq	99.8 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 39.4%
Shoshone	99.7 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 39.3%
Basques	99.7 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 39.3%
Spanish	99.7 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 39.3%
Immigrants \| Uganda	99.7 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 39.2%