Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,719,868 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750 and weighted average of 85.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,141,148 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066 and weighted average of 85.9%, a difference of 0.64%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Lithuania	Ethiopian
Minimum	80.5%	50.0%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	19.5%	50.0%
Mean	87.7%	85.5%
Median	85.8%	86.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	84.7%	85.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	88.2%	89.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.6%	3.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.5%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.4%	8.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Ethiopians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Paraguayan (85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Liberia (85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Greece (85.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Latvian (85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (85.4%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Ethiopia (85.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Cape Verdean (85.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Cameroon (85.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Liberian (85.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and Somali (85.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 85.9%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 85.9%
Cape Verdeans	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 85.8%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 85.8%
Liberians	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 85.7%
Somalis	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Somalia	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 85.6%
Norwegians	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Ireland	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 85.6%
Carpatho Rusyns	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 85.6%
Slovenes	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 85.6%
Immigrants \| Serbia	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 85.5%
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 85.4%
Latvians	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 85.4%
Paraguayans	99.9 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Liberia	99.9 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 85.3%