Immigrants from Kenya vs Indian (Asian) In Labor Force | Age 30-34

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,993,590 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 85.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,801,972 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 85.4%, a difference of 0.16%.

In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Kenya	Indian (Asian)
Minimum	75.5%	76.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	24.5%	23.4%
Mean	86.2%	85.9%
Median	85.8%	85.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.5%	84.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	87.7%	87.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.3%	3.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.9%	4.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.8%	4.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kenya and Indians (Asian) by In Labor Force | Age 30-34

In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Immigrants from Turkey (85.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Filipino (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (85.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and Polish (85.5%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Immigrants from China (85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Iran (85.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (85.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 30-34
Filipinos	99.6 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Kenya	99.6 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.6 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 85.5%
Czechs	99.6 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 85.5%
Russians	99.6 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 85.5%
Poles	99.6 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Poland	99.5 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| France	99.5 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 85.5%
Immigrants \| Brazil	99.5 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 85.5%
Soviet Union	99.4 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 85.5%
Macedonians	99.4 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 85.5%
Italians	99.4 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 85.4%
Senegalese	99.4 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 85.4%
Ghanaians	99.4 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 85.4%
Kenyans	99.3 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	99.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Iran	99.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 85.4%
Brazilians	99.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 85.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.0 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 85.4%
Indians (Asian)	99.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 85.4%