Immigrants from Chile vs Slavic In Labor Force | Age 25-29

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,609,496 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228 and weighted average of 84.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,808,387 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%.

In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Chile	Slavic
Minimum	73.3%	37.3%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	26.7%	62.7%
Mean	87.2%	85.9%
Median	85.5%	88.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	83.6%	82.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	90.4%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.7%	17.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.3%	15.1%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.2%	14.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Slavs by In Labor Force | Age 25-29

In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from South Africa (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Filipino (84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (85.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Egyptian (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Japan (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zaire (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Czechoslovakian (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 25-29
Egyptians	93.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 85.1%
Slavs	93.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Japan	93.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Zaire	93.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	92.8 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 85.0%
Czechoslovakians	92.6 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.3 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	91.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 85.0%
Costa Ricans	91.9 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 85.0%
New Zealanders	91.5 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	91.4 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 85.0%
Senegalese	90.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 85.0%
Irish	90.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	90.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 85.0%
South Africans	88.9 /100 \| #115	Excellent 85.0%
Chileans	88.8 /100 \| #116	Excellent 85.0%
Immigrants \| Belarus	88.0 /100 \| #117	Excellent 85.0%
Finns	87.8 /100 \| #118	Excellent 85.0%
Filipinos	87.1 /100 \| #119	Excellent 84.9%
Immigrants \| South Africa	86.1 /100 \| #120	Excellent 84.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	85.6 /100 \| #121	Excellent 84.9%