Immigrants from Belize vs Tlingit-Haida In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,306,944 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.468 and weighted average of 82.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,871,811 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 82.5%, a difference of 0.46%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Belize	Tlingit-Haida
Minimum	51.9%	48.6%
Maximum	95.5%	100.0%
Range	43.6%	51.4%
Mean	81.3%	80.8%
Median	82.8%	81.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	79.3%	75.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	84.4%	86.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.1%	11.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.0%	12.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.0%	12.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize and Tlingit-Haida by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Fijian (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (82.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Puget Sound Salish (82.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (82.9%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Ottawa (82.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (82.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (82.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Central American Indian (82.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Spanish American Indian (82.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 82.9%
Fijians	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #287	Tragic 82.9%
Puget Sound Salish	0.0 /100 \| #288	Tragic 82.9%
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #289	Tragic 82.9%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #290	Tragic 82.9%
Pennsylvania Germans	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 82.9%
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 82.8%
Spanish Americans	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 82.8%
Potawatomi	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 82.7%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 82.7%
Mexican American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 82.6%
Hmong	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 82.6%
Ottawa	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 82.6%
Tlingit-Haida	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 82.5%
Central American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 82.5%
Spanish American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 82.5%
Americans	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 82.4%
Nepalese	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 82.4%