Immigrants from Belarus vs Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 25-29

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,199,937 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174 and weighted average of 85.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,865,040 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%.

In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Belarus	Egyptian
Minimum	54.1%	50.2%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	45.9%	49.8%
Mean	85.7%	87.4%
Median	86.1%	86.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	82.5%	84.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	90.5%	94.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.0%	10.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.6%	9.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.6%	9.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Egyptians by In Labor Force | Age 25-29

In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Finnish (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Filipino (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Irish (85.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Switzerland (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Slavic (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Bangladeshi (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Zaire (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 25-29
Bangladeshis	94.0 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	93.9 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 85.1%
Egyptians	93.8 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 85.1%
Slavs	93.7 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Japan	93.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Zaire	93.3 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 85.1%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	92.8 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 85.0%
Czechoslovakians	92.6 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.3 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	91.9 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 85.0%
Costa Ricans	91.9 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 85.0%
New Zealanders	91.5 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	91.4 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 85.0%
Senegalese	90.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 85.0%
Irish	90.6 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 85.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	90.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 85.0%
South Africans	88.9 /100 \| #115	Excellent 85.0%
Chileans	88.8 /100 \| #116	Excellent 85.0%
Immigrants \| Belarus	88.0 /100 \| #117	Excellent 85.0%
Finns	87.8 /100 \| #118	Excellent 85.0%
Filipinos	87.1 /100 \| #119	Excellent 84.9%