Houma vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Houma
Alaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Houma
Alaskan Athabascans
81.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,788,935 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 81.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,810,545 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 64.0% | 39.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.0% | 60.7% |
Mean | 83.2% | 85.8% |
Median | 80.5% | 89.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 76.0% | 78.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.5% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.1% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 17.4% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Alaska Native (81.6%, a difference of 0.41%), Kiowa (81.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Shoshone (81.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Osage (82.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Hispanic or Latino (82.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Central America (82.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Central American Indian (82.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Yaqui (82.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 82.5% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 82.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 82.3% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 82.2% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |