Creek vs Australian In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Creek
Australian
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Creek
Australians
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Australian In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,727 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178 and weighted average of 80.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,101,072 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 84.9%, a difference of 5.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Australian |
| Minimum | 30.0% | 65.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 70.0% | 34.6% |
| Mean | 77.0% | 87.3% |
| Median | 78.8% | 85.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.3% | 82.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.8% | 95.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 13.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 9.6% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Demographics Similar to Creek by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Ute (80.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cheyenne (80.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.3% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Uruguayan (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Singapore (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Scandinavian (84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Dutch (84.9%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants | Chile | 85.6 /100 | #121 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Scandinavians | 85.1 /100 | #122 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Dutch | 84.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 84.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Uruguayans | 84.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 84.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 84.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Australians | 83.6 /100 | #128 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 81.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 81.3 /100 | #130 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Iranians | 78.1 /100 | #131 | Good 84.8% |
| Romanians | 77.7 /100 | #132 | Good 84.8% |
| Asians | 77.7 /100 | #133 | Good 84.8% |
| Syrians | 76.5 /100 | #134 | Good 84.8% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 76.4 /100 | #135 | Good 84.8% |