Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America In Labor Force | Age 45-54

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,988,239 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218 and weighted average of 81.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 557,910,063 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 81.0%, a difference of 0.30%.

In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chippewa	Immigrants from Latin America
Minimum	38.5%	69.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	61.5%	30.4%
Mean	77.6%	82.4%
Median	79.8%	81.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	72.5%	80.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	85.6%	84.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	13.2%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.6%	4.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	14.5%	4.0%

Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America by In Labor Force | Age 45-54

In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are British West Indian (81.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Nonimmigrants (81.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish (81.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (81.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Barbados (81.3%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Grenada (81.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Aleut (81.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guatemala (81.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Micronesia (81.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Guatemalan (81.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 45-54
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 81.4%
West Indians	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 81.4%
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.0 /100 \| #268	Tragic 81.4%
Alsatians	0.0 /100 \| #269	Tragic 81.3%
Bangladeshis	0.0 /100 \| #270	Tragic 81.3%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #271	Tragic 81.3%
Spanish	0.0 /100 \| #272	Tragic 81.3%
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #273	Tragic 81.3%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 81.2%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 81.2%
U.S. Virgin Islanders	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 81.2%
Guatemalans	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 81.2%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 81.1%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 81.1%
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 81.0%
Immigrants \| Grenada	0.0 /100 \| #281	Tragic 81.0%
Aleuts	0.0 /100 \| #282	Tragic 81.0%
French American Indians	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 80.8%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 80.8%
Delaware	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 80.8%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 80.8%