Chinese vs Turkish In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Chinese
Turkish
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Chinese
Turks
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Turkish In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,125 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.452 and weighted average of 80.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,859,072 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 80.3%, a difference of 0.41%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Turkish |
| Minimum | 51.7% | 53.3% |
| Maximum | 86.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 34.5% | 46.7% |
| Mean | 79.0% | 79.0% |
| Median | 80.5% | 80.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 77.7% | 77.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.0% | 81.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Turks by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Brazil (80.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (80.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Poland (80.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Paraguayan (80.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Moldova (80.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (80.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sudan (80.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (80.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (80.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Africa (80.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Ugandans | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Brazilians | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Czechs | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Slovenes | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 80.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 99.6 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 80.4% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 80.3% |