Chinese vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Chinese
Chippewa
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Chinese
Chippewa
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
77.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Chippewa In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 77.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,944,357 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 77.1%, a difference of 0.25%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Chippewa |
Minimum | 57.5% | 24.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.5% | 75.2% |
Mean | 79.9% | 76.9% |
Median | 79.7% | 79.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 75.5% | 69.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.0% | 88.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 17.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Chippewa by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Serbian (77.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Malaysian (77.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Croatian (77.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (77.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indonesian (77.2%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Liberia (77.1%, a difference of 0.020%), European (77.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Hawaiian (77.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Celtic (77.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Scotch-Irish (77.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 77.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Serbians | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 77.3% |
Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 77.2% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Chippewa | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 77.1% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 77.0% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 77.0% |
Kenyans | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 77.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 77.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 77.0% |
Lithuanians | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 77.0% |