Bhutanese vs South African In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Bhutanese
South African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Bhutanese
South Africans
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs South African In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,605,488 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,600,906 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 65.3%, a difference of 0.28%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | South African |
| Minimum | 52.7% | 52.6% |
| Maximum | 82.4% | 95.6% |
| Range | 29.7% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 64.2% | 67.1% |
| Median | 64.0% | 64.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.1% | 60.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.6% | 72.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and South Africans by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Albanian (65.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Danish (65.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Australian (65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from South Africa (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
| Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 74.6 /100 | #159 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 73.5 /100 | #160 | Good 65.3% |
| Australians | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 65.3% |
| Albanians | 70.8 /100 | #162 | Good 65.3% |
| South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #163 | Good 65.3% |
| Danes | 68.8 /100 | #164 | Good 65.3% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 68.1 /100 | #165 | Good 65.3% |