Barbadian vs Immigrants from Israel In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,232,265 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.465 and weighted average of 31.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,706,928 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 30.5%, a difference of 1.7%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Barbadian	Immigrants from Israel
Minimum	3.1%	6.1%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	96.9%	93.9%
Mean	34.4%	28.4%
Median	34.6%	25.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	22.6%	21.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	40.1%	30.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	17.4%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.3%	18.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.1%	18.4%

Demographics Similar to Barbadians and Immigrants from Israel by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Immigrants from Ecuador (31.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Taiwan (31.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Lumbee (31.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (31.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (30.9%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Hong Kong (30.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Puerto Rican (30.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Cuba (30.2%, a difference of 0.77%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (30.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (30.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Ecuadorians	0.0 /100 \| #320	Tragic 31.4%
West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #321	Tragic 31.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #322	Tragic 31.3%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 31.2%
Dominicans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 31.2%
Immigrants \| China	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Dominican Republic	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 31.1%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 31.0%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 31.0%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 31.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 31.0%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 30.9%
Immigrants \| Israel	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 30.5%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 30.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 30.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 30.2%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 30.0%
Vietnamese	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 29.6%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 29.2%
British West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 29.1%