Lumbee vs Chickasaw Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,190,651 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323 and weighted average of $65,113. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,555,811 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.338 and weighted average of $82,193, a difference of 26.2%.

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Puerto Rican ($69,234, a difference of 6.3%), Navajo ($69,759, a difference of 7.1%), Houma ($72,093, a difference of 10.7%), Pima ($73,365, a difference of 12.7%), and Tohono O'odham ($73,774, a difference of 13.3%).

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Apache ($82,184, a difference of 0.010%), Yuman ($82,139, a difference of 0.070%), Choctaw ($82,287, a difference of 0.11%), Colville ($82,474, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Caribbean ($82,513, a difference of 0.39%).