Immigrants from Turkey vs Chinese Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,848,183 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112 and weighted average of $114,407. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,773,263 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and household income with householder between the ages 45 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069 and weighted average of $116,156, a difference of 1.5%.

Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Turkey	Chinese
Minimum	$92,363	$52,969
Maximum	$205,770	$203,211
Range	$113,407	$150,242
Mean	$127,654	$114,652
Median	$126,227	$110,020
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$104,873	$93,748
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$134,485	$132,670
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$29,612	$38,922
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$27,992	$33,042
Standard Deviation (Population)	$27,203	$32,746

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Chinese by Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years

In terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Pakistan ($114,434, a difference of 0.020%), Cambodian ($114,342, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania ($114,336, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian ($114,220, a difference of 0.16%), and Israeli ($114,186, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Denmark ($116,000, a difference of 0.13%), Russian ($116,328, a difference of 0.15%), Latvian ($115,957, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Switzerland ($115,934, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Asia ($116,566, a difference of 0.35%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Ages 45 - 64 years
Immigrants \| Sweden	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional $118,318
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional $117,930
Turks	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional $117,814
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional $117,750
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional $117,731
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional $116,566
Russians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional $116,328
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $116,156
Immigrants \| Denmark	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $116,000
Latvians	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $115,957
Immigrants \| Switzerland	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $115,934
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $114,754
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $114,434
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $114,407
Cambodians	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $114,342
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $114,336
Estonians	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $114,220
Israelis	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $114,186
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $113,883
Immigrants \| France	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $113,680
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $113,548