Immigrants from Norway vs Bhutanese Median Family Income

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,680,488 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.118 and weighted average of $115,847. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,953,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of $119,800, a difference of 3.4%.

Median Family Income Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Norway	Bhutanese
Minimum	$50,417	$63,382
Maximum	$250,001	$194,165
Range	$199,584	$130,783
Mean	$137,530	$120,532
Median	$133,287	$114,614
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$108,664	$101,662
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$150,184	$136,845
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$41,519	$35,183
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$50,729	$25,704
Standard Deviation (Population)	$49,661	$25,585

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Bhutanese by Median Family Income

In terms of median family income, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Maltese ($115,862, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($115,880, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia ($116,165, a difference of 0.27%), Chinese ($116,188, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from South Africa ($116,286, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Bolivian ($119,479, a difference of 0.27%), Soviet Union ($119,262, a difference of 0.45%), Israeli ($118,577, a difference of 1.0%), Australian ($118,440, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Turkey ($118,325, a difference of 1.3%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Median Family Income
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $119,800
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $119,479
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $119,262
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $118,577
Australians	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $118,440
Immigrants \| Turkey	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $118,325
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $118,291
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $118,053
Estonians	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $118,013
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $117,912
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $117,818
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $117,780
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $117,344
Immigrants \| Russia	99.9 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $116,942
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional $116,830
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $116,286
Chinese	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional $116,188
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional $116,165
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional $115,880
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional $115,862
Immigrants \| Norway	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional $115,847