Immigrants from Congo vs Spanish American Indian Wage/Income Gap

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,125,564 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204 and weighted average of 21.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,143,386 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.346 and weighted average of 22.5%, a difference of 4.0%.

Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Congo	Spanish American Indian
Minimum	0.90%	11.9%
Maximum	40.3%	37.9%
Range	39.4%	26.0%
Mean	20.6%	24.1%
Median	21.3%	24.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.4%	19.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	25.4%	28.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.0%	8.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.9%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.9%	5.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo and Spanish American Indians by Wage/Income Gap

In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Black/African American (21.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (21.6%, a difference of 0.55%), U.S. Virgin Islander (21.5%, a difference of 0.67%), Ethiopian (21.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Immigrants from Ecuador (22.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Guatemalan (22.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Guatemala (22.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Fiji (22.4%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (22.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Wage/Income Gap
U.S. Virgin Islanders	100.0 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 21.5%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	100.0 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 21.6%
Immigrants \| Congo	100.0 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 21.7%
Blacks/African Americans	100.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 21.7%
Ethiopians	100.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 21.8%
Immigrants \| Western Africa	100.0 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 22.0%
Tohono O'odham	100.0 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 22.1%
Immigrants \| Cameroon	100.0 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 22.2%
Bangladeshis	100.0 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 22.2%
Nepalese	100.0 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 22.2%
Immigrants \| Zaire	100.0 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 22.3%
Immigrants \| Ghana	100.0 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 22.3%
Ghanaians	100.0 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 22.3%
Immigrants \| Cuba	100.0 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 22.4%
Navajo	100.0 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	100.0 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Fiji	100.0 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 22.4%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	100.0 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 22.5%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	100.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 22.5%
Spanish American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 22.5%
Guatemalans	99.9 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 22.6%