Czech vs Houma Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Czech
Houma
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Czechs
Houma
29.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.7%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Houma Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,001,232 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 29.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,791,242 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.642 and weighted average of 38.7%, a difference of 32.5%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Houma |
Minimum | 3.2% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 71.0% |
Range | 63.5% | 61.6% |
Mean | 31.6% | 41.5% |
Median | 30.4% | 43.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.4% | 34.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.7% | 50.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 15.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 15.1% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Houma by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are German (29.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Scottish (29.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Scandinavian (29.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (29.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and European (29.4%, a difference of 0.70%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Cajun (33.9%, a difference of 14.1%), Immigrants from India (31.5%, a difference of 22.6%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (31.0%, a difference of 24.7%), Danish (31.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and Pennsylvania German (30.7%, a difference of 25.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 29.1% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 29.1% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 29.2% |
Czechs | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 29.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 29.3% |
Europeans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 29.4% |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 29.4% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 29.5% |
English | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.5% |
Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.6% |
Filipinos | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 29.7% |
Iranians | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 29.7% |
Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.0% |
Thais | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 30.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 30.7% |
Danes | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 31.0% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 31.0% |
Immigrants | India | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 31.5% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 33.9% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 38.7% |