Canadian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Householder Income Over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,051,930 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Canadians and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of $62,230. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,347,436 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and household income with householder over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of $66,376, a difference of 6.7%.

Householder Income Over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Canadian	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Minimum	$28,616	$21,250
Maximum	$108,103	$118,263
Range	$79,487	$97,013
Mean	$62,811	$65,530
Median	$61,617	$62,798
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$55,674	$52,303
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$70,369	$76,120
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$14,695	$23,817
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$16,050	$21,477
Standard Deviation (Population)	$15,805	$21,281

Similar Demographics by Householder Income Over 65 years

Demographics Similar to Canadians by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are South American Indian ($62,215, a difference of 0.020%), Arab ($62,266, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese ($62,287, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan ($62,292, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Belarus ($62,162, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| Brazil	81.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent $62,364
Immigrants \| Chile	81.0 /100 \| #135	Excellent $62,354
Alaskan Athabascans	80.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent $62,330
Immigrants \| Syria	80.2 /100 \| #137	Excellent $62,303
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	80.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent $62,292
Lebanese	79.9 /100 \| #139	Good $62,287
Arabs	79.6 /100 \| #140	Good $62,266
Canadians	79.0 /100 \| #141	Good $62,230
South American Indians	78.7 /100 \| #142	Good $62,215
Immigrants \| Belarus	77.8 /100 \| #143	Good $62,162
Immigrants \| Peru	74.4 /100 \| #144	Good $61,988
Immigrants \| Uganda	74.2 /100 \| #145	Good $61,976
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	72.7 /100 \| #146	Good $61,902
Immigrants \| Nepal	71.4 /100 \| #147	Good $61,843
Alsatians	70.5 /100 \| #148	Good $61,797

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Householder Income Over 65 years

In terms of householder income over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Laotian ($66,306, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Netherlands ($66,463, a difference of 0.13%), Bulgarian ($66,236, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Philippines ($66,161, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Pakistan ($66,617, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| France	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $66,826
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional $66,694
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional $66,672
Israelis	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional $66,636
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional $66,620
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional $66,617
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional $66,463
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional $66,376
Laotians	99.6 /100 \| #56	Exceptional $66,306
Bulgarians	99.6 /100 \| #57	Exceptional $66,236
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.6 /100 \| #58	Exceptional $66,161
Immigrants \| Norway	99.5 /100 \| #59	Exceptional $66,118
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.5 /100 \| #60	Exceptional $66,087
Maltese	99.5 /100 \| #61	Exceptional $66,027
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	99.5 /100 \| #62	Exceptional $66,009

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| Brazil	81.2 /100 \| #134	Excellent $62,364
Immigrants \| Chile	81.0 /100 \| #135	Excellent $62,354
Alaskan Athabascans	80.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent $62,330
Immigrants \| Syria	80.2 /100 \| #137	Excellent $62,303
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	80.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent $62,292
Lebanese	79.9 /100 \| #139	Good $62,287
Arabs	79.6 /100 \| #140	Good $62,266
Canadians	79.0 /100 \| #141	Good $62,230
South American Indians	78.7 /100 \| #142	Good $62,215
Immigrants \| Belarus	77.8 /100 \| #143	Good $62,162
Immigrants \| Peru	74.4 /100 \| #144	Good $61,988
Immigrants \| Uganda	74.2 /100 \| #145	Good $61,976
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	72.7 /100 \| #146	Good $61,902
Immigrants \| Nepal	71.4 /100 \| #147	Good $61,843
Alsatians	70.5 /100 \| #148	Good $61,797

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Householder Income Over 65 years
Immigrants \| France	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $66,826
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional $66,694
Immigrants \| Turkey	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional $66,672
Israelis	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional $66,636
Immigrants \| Scotland	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional $66,620
Immigrants \| Pakistan	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional $66,617
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional $66,463
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional $66,376
Laotians	99.6 /100 \| #56	Exceptional $66,306
Bulgarians	99.6 /100 \| #57	Exceptional $66,236
Immigrants \| Philippines	99.6 /100 \| #58	Exceptional $66,161
Immigrants \| Norway	99.5 /100 \| #59	Exceptional $66,118
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.5 /100 \| #60	Exceptional $66,087
Maltese	99.5 /100 \| #61	Exceptional $66,027
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	99.5 /100 \| #62	Exceptional $66,009