Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Births to Unmarried Women
28.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,731,208 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 28.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 12.7% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Tongan (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Egypt (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (28.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Europe (28.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bolivian (28.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants from Albania | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants from Turkey | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants from North Macedonia | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Egyptians | 99.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants from Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Tongans | 98.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 98.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 98.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Palestinians | 98.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Europe | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Bolivians | 98.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Jordanians | 98.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 5.1% |
Maximum | 5.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 5.8% | 94.9% |
Mean | 1.3% | 42.1% |
Median | 1.0% | 35.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.49% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.6% | 53.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 28.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 25.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 25.1% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 128,110,315 | 32.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.072% | 36,278,735 | 25.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 9,709,098 | 24.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 4,301,941 | 26.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 2,280,010 | 22.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,140,287 | 26.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 940,348 | 32.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 458,808 | 29.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 306,427 | 39.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 296,508 | 22.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 209,625 | 35.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 203,906 | 22.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 66,671 | 39.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 109,244 | 23.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 43,058 | 38.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 4,235 | 62.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 108,351 | 39.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 26,998 | 44.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 18,874 | 28.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 26,172 | 37.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 1,678 | 57.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 2,411 | 68.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 2,695 | 36.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 25,784 | 33.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 1,540 | 27.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 9,315 | 76.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 50.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 5,535 | 43.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 21,886 | 5.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 1,341 | 100.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 2,500 | 23.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 1,336 | 11.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 14.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 260 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 4,786 | 56.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 100.0% |