Sudanese vs Ghanaian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Sudanese
Ghanaian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Sudanese
Ghanaians
42.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Ghanaian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,110,852 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.407 and weighted average of 42.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,506,796 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 42.2%, a difference of 0.38%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 10.0% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 66.9% | 82.9% |
Range | 56.9% | 66.7% |
Mean | 41.4% | 45.7% |
Median | 41.9% | 44.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.8% | 39.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.1% | 51.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Ghanaians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Honduran (42.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eritrea (42.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute (42.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indonesian (42.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eritrea (42.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and Inupiat (42.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |