Sioux vs Crow Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Sioux
Crow
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Sioux
Crow
41.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
41.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Crow Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,109,143 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.639 and weighted average of 41.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,202,817 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 41.4%, a difference of 0.38%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sioux | Crow |
Minimum | 3.8% | 21.9% |
Maximum | 73.2% | 80.8% |
Range | 69.4% | 58.9% |
Mean | 38.1% | 45.1% |
Median | 40.9% | 43.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.5% | 37.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 53.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Crow by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (41.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Guyanese (41.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (41.4%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Guyanese (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Haitian (41.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 40.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 40.9% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 40.8% |