Sierra Leonean vs Osage Family Households
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Osage
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Osage
63.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
11.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
7.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Osage Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,352,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 63.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,796,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 63.7%, a difference of 0.18%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Osage |
Minimum | 55.9% | 49.2% |
Maximum | 87.8% | 77.6% |
Range | 31.8% | 28.5% |
Mean | 67.7% | 64.8% |
Median | 65.2% | 65.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 61.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.0% | 68.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans and Osage by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Nigerian (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (63.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (63.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (63.9%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Marshallese (63.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Macedonian (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Europe (63.7%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |
Osage | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 63.7% |
Marshallese | 6.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 63.7% |
Macedonians | 6.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |