Puget Sound Salish vs Hopi Family Households
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Hopi
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Hopi
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Hopi Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,155,865 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,733,485 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118 and weighted average of 65.3%, a difference of 0.54%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Hopi |
Minimum | 52.5% | 38.9% |
Maximum | 85.1% | 95.7% |
Range | 32.6% | 56.8% |
Mean | 66.0% | 70.5% |
Median | 65.6% | 72.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.4% | 62.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 79.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 17.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Hopi by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Guyanese (65.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Poland (65.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Crow (65.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Portugal (65.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Swiss (65.2%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 99.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 99.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Crow | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Hopi | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Guyanese | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 65.3% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 98.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |