Polish vs Celtic Family Households
COMPARE
Polish
Celtic
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Poles
Celtics
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Celtic Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,976,877 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.394 and weighted average of 64.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,430 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391 and weighted average of 63.8%, a difference of 0.33%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Celtic |
| Minimum | 30.3% | 38.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 69.7% | 61.9% |
| Mean | 68.0% | 67.4% |
| Median | 65.4% | 65.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 61.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.9% | 71.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Celtics by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Canada (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (64.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Belgian (63.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (63.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Shoshone (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (63.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
| Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
| Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
| Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
| Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
| Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 12.8 /100 | #204 | Poor 63.9% |
| Brazilians | 12.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 12.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 63.9% |
| Nigerians | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 11.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 63.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 11.2 /100 | #209 | Poor 63.9% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Shoshone | 9.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 9.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 8.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Celtics | 8.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Belgians | 7.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 63.8% |
| Croatians | 7.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 63.8% |