Pima vs Immigrants from Central America Single Father Households
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Central America
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Central America
4.2%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Immigrants from Central America Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,336,251 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.568 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 526,445,722 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 39.2%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Immigrants from Central America |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 13.4% |
| Range | 29.1% | 12.8% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 4.0% |
| Median | 4.0% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Immigrants from Central America by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Tohono O'odham (3.8%, a difference of 9.2%), Crow (3.5%, a difference of 18.8%), Alaska Native (3.5%, a difference of 19.2%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and Sioux (3.3%, a difference of 25.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Fijian (3.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Mexico (3.0%, a difference of 1.3%), Aleut (3.0%, a difference of 1.5%), Bangladeshi (3.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (3.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.5% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.8% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.2% |