Pima vs Houma Family Households
COMPARE
Pima
Houma
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Pima
Houma
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Houma Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,599 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 65.7%, a difference of 0.34%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Houma |
Minimum | 40.4% | 53.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 78.8% |
Range | 59.6% | 25.0% |
Mean | 69.9% | 67.7% |
Median | 68.5% | 67.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.1% | 65.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.5% | 71.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Houma by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Burmese (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |